

This is an outrage!
By: Ted | September 23rd, 2008
What an absolute disgrace. Two years ago West Ham broke a rule that few people knew existed and paid the biggest fine in Premier League history because of it. Fair enough, I can bite the bullet here. However, because a certain team that finished three places below us have been unable to come to terms with the fact that they weren’t good enough on the pitch to stay up, they have endlessly appealed to any authority from which they can get revenge. West Ham indulged them and in an attempt to draw a line under the entire incident accepted a final tribunal on the matter. This tribunal, made up of three people with no football knowledge have essentially decided that Tevez was worth at least three points to West Ham that season, which would have seen us relegated in the other team’s place. Well, following that logic, he was worth a lot more than three points, so why not get Charlton in on the act who were also relegated that year. The entire argument is ridiculous anyway, as no one player’s worth in points can be measured. Every player played a huge part in our survival including Zamora, Noble, Collins, Neill and Green to name but a few. Furthermore, this completely overlooks the disruption that the arrival of Tevez caused which resulted in our poor form that led to relegation worries in the first place, and that fact that he didn’t score for the first seven months of the season anyway. Lastly, this sets a dangerous precedent. Simply by endlessly whining, this club has been able to force West Ham to go through various stages of legal battles until they finally give in. Why should a team be able to try and whine their way back into the Premiership. That team weren’t good enough on the pitch, so they went down. The chairman of that club, not content with a potentially huge payout, has already been suggesting that now he can nag his way back to the top flight as well. Anything other than performances on the pitch will do for this man. I for one hope that before this whole affair is settled, that they end up in the third tier of English football, and I would gladly see us pay them the extra money they would lose for not playing in the second level of the league pyramid.
P.S. Respect to Charlton Athletic for moving on and trying to get back to the Premier League by playing football, and shame on Dave Whelan and Al Fayed, who promised that club their support, for abandoning them as soon as their own teams managed to stay up.
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to West Ham | |||
| Hammers Scores | Boleyn Ground information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



I dunno. You’re right, you can’t measure a player in points, but West Ham shouldn’t have had Tevez, knew they shouldn’t have had Tevez, and it did seem he pretty much kept West Ham up. Its take so long that noone cares anymore though.
Posted from
United States

-



No player is worth any amount of points, but a team breaking them knowingly does deserve punishment. Tevez wasn’t playing for West Ham legally, and West Ham deserve whatever they get.
Posted from
United States

-



Didn’t the FA clear West Ham to play Tevez though?
Posted from
United States

-



Ted — you or AlexG interested in doing a chat session, or a Q & A email exchange as a preview for Saturday’s match?
If so, email me at timmyintransit@gmail.com
Hope to hear from you!
Posted from
United States

-



ale, the legal position on this (first established by the FA panel that fined West Ham and followed by this tribunal) is that West Ham obtained Tevez’ clearance to play under false pretences by by concealing the true nature of their arrangements with MSI from the FA and Premier League.
Posted from
Italy

-



So does this mean ManUre will be fined for picking up an ineligible player, or are the rules different for West Ham and poorer clubs like them? The rules for acquiring a player were broken according to FA law. West Ham paid for that according to the FA’s RULES and were fined. But because Sheffield United were relegated, they decided to recoup lost millions by complaining about the FA’s rules not satisfying THEM. Maybe S.U. should sue the FA? Sheffield United didn’t go down because of Tevez, they went down because they were awful. Did Sheffield United complain after beating us 3-0 WITH Tevez on the pitch that day at Bramall Lane???
Posted from
United States

-



This was one of the most ridiculous rulings I have ever come across, the fact that a tribunal put an arbitrary three point on value on Tevez seems to set a precendent that a player can equal a set number of points for a team. Watching Tevez and West Ham when he was on the club one would think he was worth more than that, but it is funny to think that Tevez did it alone. Last time I checked he had ten teammates as well and though scored he goals he most certainly did not do it all on his own. Where does Mascherano and Liverpool now stand in all this, werent the player both in the same fashion from the same “middle man.” This is a poor decision and punishes a club that has already had to endure the loss of both Tevez and Mascherano and now the fine, another case of the rich getting richer…
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed












